Monday, March 31, 2014

Literature Analysis #3


The Jungle centers around a family who immigrated to Chicago’s Packingtown from Lithuania to “get rich”. The family comes in hesitant to trust Americans, but optimistic about what the future will bring. However, as time passes the family begins to realize the harsh realities of working in this industrial nightmare. The whole family finds jobs in the meat packing district and each endures their own kind of horrors. Although the novel includes a variety of characters, the plot mostly focuses on Jurgis who is the “man of the house”. The family continues to struggle  and everyone is forced to make sacrifices. They reach a breaking point when Jurgis’s wife,  Ona dies while giving birth to a still born baby. Jurgis breaks down but trudges on with the thought of his one year old so Antanas on his mind. Tragedy strikes once again when Jurgis comes home to find that Antanas has drownd in the streets. This absolutely destroys Jurgis so he leaves the family and Chicago to go live by himself in the country side. Jurgis continues to live an unstable, homeless life where he tries many different menial jobs, gets involved in crooked politics and begins to steal. Eventually Jurgis falls into a group of men who are trying to spread the idea of socialism and he joins their cause.


The obvious theme throughout this novel is that capitalism can be extremely cruel. Sinclair brings the reader on a journey of despair, tragedy and hopelessness by highlighting the evils of living in “dog eat dog world”. The true evil that is revealed that in capitalism few truly benefit while the working class faces a daily struggle of trying to stay alive.

The authors tone in this novel is sympathetic. It is evident that Sinclair feels for his characters and thinks it is extremely unjust the way they are living. Sinclair wrote this to make others aware of how horrible workers are treated so his tone is defiantly in favor of the working class.

Characterization

Sinclair uses direct characterization in the beginning of the novel when he describes Jurgis as being big, confident and strong. These traits aren’t revealed through actions they are written plainly by the author. An example of indirect characterization is when Jurgis goes after Ona’s boss for sending her to the whore house. This shows how quick of a temper Jurgis has and how deeply he cares about his poor wife.

The diction and syntax remain relatively the same throughout the novel. Sinclair varies in sentence length both the story is written simply and easy to follow. However, at the end the book becomes more technical when going in depth about politics and socialism. During these politically driven chapters there are many long speeches that Sinclair includes from various socialist supporting men.

Jurgis is practically the definition of a dynamic character. He arrives in Chicago optimistic and hopeful then when trouble falls on him he becomes hardened and dark. Later on he changes again and experiments with being a thief and having crooked morals. The novel ends with him finding hope again and having a cause, something to live for and believe in. It seems as though he goes through major personality changes frequently and I believe this to be a direct result of the corrupt, atrocious atmosphere he is surrounded by.

This book actually changed my outlook on a lot of things and affected me in a number of ways. I was disgusted by not only the food making processes but also the incredibly terrible treatment of the workers in Packingtown. The worst part of reading this novel is making the realization that the things Sinclair wrote about were based off of true events. Sure they may not have been a Jurgis or an Ona but their were/ still are thousands of millions of people who lived the terrible lives and received the despicable treatment that the characters in this book did. This book has furthered my interest in helping the poor and aiding those who do not have a voice.
 

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Essay Draft/ Brainstorming

PROMPT
1979 Choose a complex and important character in a novel or a play of
recognized literary merit who might, on the basis of the character’s actions alone,
be considered evil or immoral. In a well-organized essay, explain both how and
why the full presentation of the character in the work makes us react more
sympathetically than we otherwise might. Avoid plot summary.


Immoral: not conforming to accepted standards

Both Bernard and John the Savage. The latter more extreme and vocal about it.

John: throws out all the soma, mourns over mothers death, disgusted by the “twins, repulsed by Lenina’s sexual advances

Lit Techniques: indirect characterization, allusions, juxtaposition

Monday, March 10, 2014

Go Go Go

Our project is officially launched! Go follow us at:
 theadventuresofusproject.tumblr.com

10 Questions

The 10 questions I would ask my experts are...
1. What's the biggest lesson your adventures have taught you?
2. Where is your favorite place you have been?
3. Who inspires you?
4. What are your plans for the future?
5. Do you regret anything in life?
6. Who do you love?
7. What do you look forward to in life?
8. What inspired your journey?
9. Tips on traveling?
10. What's the best advice you have ever received?